Capablanca, Jose - Alekhine, Alexander
World Championship 13th

[1927.10.01]

[D52m]

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6

[ this variation may also arise through a corresponding order of moves out of the Slav defense: 2. ... c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 when Black avoids the sharpest Botvinnik variation and is sufficed with a modest continuation 5. ... Nbd7 ]
3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 Nbd7 5.Bg5 c6 6.e3 The Cambridge-Springs variation became especially popular after the match Capablanca – Alekhine (1927). In which it was Alekhine's main weapon against 1.d4. We start our narration with the classic games out of this match in order first to acknowledge the main strategic ideas of this variation 6. ... Qa5 The Cambridge-Springs system was introduced in practice by the American grandmaster H. Pillsbury. It is characterized by the black queen's development to a5, from where it exerts pressure along the a5-e1 diagonal, which may be supported by the black bishop lunge Bf8-b4 together with the Nf6-e4 maneuver, and also operates on the fifth rank acting against the white g5-bishop. These tactical opportunities for Black force White to the continuation 7.Nd2 the white knight's retreat neutralizes the unpleasant tension arisen on the a5-e1 diagonal.
[ Otherwise the double edged variation is possible 7.cxd5 Nxd5! 8.Qd2 in which White frequently must sacrifice a pawn 8. ... Bb4 9.Rc1 O-O! 10.e4 Nxc3 11.bxc3 Ba3 12.Rb1 e5 13.Bd3 Re8 14.O-O b6! 15.Rfe1 Ba6= Vajda-Grünfeld/London/1927 ]
7. ... Bb4 8.Qc2 O-O
[ 8. ... dxc4 9.Bxf6 Nxf6 10.Nxc4 Qc7 which leads to a calm positional struggle. ]
9.Bh4!? /\ Bd3 - This is a cunning retreat of the white bishop. Usually they played 9.Be2 that may be replied with 9...e5 or 9...c5.
[ 9.Bxf6 Nxf6 10.Bd3 Re8 11.O-O e5 Rotlevi-Marshall/Karlsbad/ 1911/ ]
[ 9.f4 Ng4 10.Ke2 Euwe ]
9. ... c5
[ A. Alekhine did not like 9. ... e5?! 10.dxe5 Ne4 11.Ndxe4
[ 11.Ncxe4 dxe4 12.a3 Nxe5 13.Rd1 Bxd2+ 14.Qxd2 Qxd2+ 15.Rxd2 Bf5 16.Bg3 Nd3+ 17.Bxd3 exd3 1/2-1/2, Bellon Lopez Juan Manuel 2442 - Vera Reynaldo 2557, Santa Clara 2001 Memorial G. Garcia ]
11. ... dxe4 12.e6! Ne5! 13.exf7+ Rxf7 14.Be2
[ "with better chances for White" but the continuation 14.O-O-O! Bf5! gives Black good counter play.
[ 14. ... Bxc3?! 15.bxc3 15. ... Bf5 16.Rd4 With advantage in the endgame. Alekhine ]
]
14. ... Nd3+→ Asztalos ]
10.Nb3
[ 10.dxc5 Ne4 11.Rc1 Ndxc5 12.Be7+= Havasi-Asztalos/Raab/1924/ ]
10. ... Qa4!? 11.Bxf6 Nxf6 12.dxc5 Ne4?! Time for this move: More than 1h.
[ Black should have continued 12. ... Bxc3+! 13.Qxc3 Ne4 14.Qa5 14. ... Qxa5+ 15.Nxa5 Nxc5+= Capablanca 16.cxd5 exd5 17.Be2 with White's minimal edge, 1-0, Lopez Martinez Josep Manuel (ESP) 2474 - San Segundo Carrillo Pablo (ESP) 2528, Cala Mendia (Spain) 2001 ]
13.cxd5?! 13. ... Bxc3+? 14.bxc3 Nxc5
[ 14. ... exd5 15.Bd3 /\ c3-c4 ]
15.Rd1! 15. ... exd5 16.Rxd5 Nxb3?!
[ 16. ... b6 Lasker 17.Be2!
[ 17.Rd4 Qc6 18.Nxc5
[ 18.Bc4 Teschner ]
18. ... bxc5 19.Rh4 f5 20.Bc4+ Kh8 21.O-O Bb7 22.f3 Rad8 With counterchances. >< Rh4 Soutanbeieff ]
[ 17.Rd2 Teschner ]
17. ... Qe4 18.Qxe4 Nxe4 19.Bf3! +/- ]
17.axb3 Qc6 18.Rd4! /\ f3, Kf2 - This is an ideal position for the white rook. It turns out that Black has not obtained compensation for the given pawn. 18. ... Re8 19.Bd3! We encounter a dynamic way of realizing the advantage.
[ 19.Qd2 Be6 20.c4 a5! /\ a4 ]
[ 19.e4 /\ f3 +- Alekhine ]
19. ... Qxg2 20.Bxh7+ Kf8
[ 20. ... Kh8 21.Be4 Qh3 22.Rg1 /\ c4, Qc3 -> Golombek ]
21.Be4 Qh3 22.Qd2! Be6 23.c4 /\ Qb4 23. ... a5 24.Rg1! /\ Qb2 White returns a pawn for the sake of developing the attack. 24. ... Qxh2
[ 24. ... Qh6? +/- Golombek ]
25.Rh1 Qc7 26.Qb2! /\ 27.Qa3 Kg8 28.Bh7 Kh8 29.Rdh4! +- /\27.Th8 26. ... Qc5 27.Bd5 /\ 28.Be6 fe 29.Rf4 Kg8 30.Qc2 +- 27. ... Ra6? 28.Re4! +- ><g7[%csl Rg7] 28. ... Rd6 /\ 29... Qb4 30... Rd4
[ 28. ... g6 29.Qf6+- Golombek ]
29.Rh7! Ke7 30.Qxg7 Kd8 31.Bxe6 fxe6
[ 31. ... Rexe6 32.Qf8+ /\ 33.Rf7 +- ]
32.Qxb7 /\ 33.Qb8 +- 32. ... Qb4+ 33.Qxb4 axb4 34.c5 Rc6 35.Rxb4 Rxc5 36.Ra7 /\ 37.Rb8 Rc8 38.Rc8 Kc8 39.Ra8 +- 36... Rc8? 37.Rd4# Epaulettenmatt
1-0

Created with Scid