Kasparov, Garry - Salov, Valery
Rossolimo - Sicilian 2...Nc6 3.Bb5 e6
[1991.07.14]
[B30v]
=-=
Rossolimo - Sicilian 2...Nc6 3.Bb5 e6
[1991.07.14]
[B30v]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 e6 This is one of the most elastic objections to the system with Bb5. Black prepares developing his king's knight to e7 followed by repelling the b5-bishop by a7-a6. At that, Black tries to avoid doubling the queenside pawns in the case of ¥xc6 4.O-O
[
4.Bxc6
bxc6
5.O-O
Black obtains a flexible position by transferring his g8-knight to g6.
5. ... Ne7
6.b3
Ng6
7.Bb2
f6!
8.d4
cxd4
9.Nxd4
Be7
10.c4
O-O
11.Nc3
Qc7
12.Qd2
a6
13.Rad1
Bb7
14.f4
Rad8
15.Nde2
f5
Savon - Gulko, Vilnius (zt) 1975
]
4. ... Nge7
5.c3
One of the guiding motifs in White's play is creating the pawn center by means of d2-d4.
5. ... d5
Preventing White's designs of erecting the powerful pawn center. However, play is opened up in this region of the board and Black must act accurately to neutralize White's development lead.
[
5. ... a6
6.Ba4
b5
6.exd5
Qxd5
7.Re1!
[
6. ... d5
7.exd5
Qxd5
8.d4
Bd7
7.Bc2
d5
After having ousted the white bishop from the striking diagonal a4-e8, Black conducts the d7-d5 advance at last. The b7-b5 advance however may have a drawback rendering the black queenside occasionally vulnerable after the possible a2-a4 detriment.
8.e5
8. ... d4
9.Be4
Bb7
[
8. ... b5?
9.c4!!
Qd6
10.cxb5
Nxd4
11.bxa6+
Nec6
12.Bf4! +-
Qd5
13.Nxd4
cxd4
14.Nc3
1-0 Wahls - Du.Rajkovic, Germany 1992
]
9.Re1
Rd8
10.c4!
Qxc4
11.Nbd2
Qd5
12.Bb3
Qh5
13.Ne4
Nf5+/-
Spassky - Timman, Amsterdam 1977
][
9. ... d3?!
10.b3
Ra7
11.Re1
Rd7
12.c4?!
12. ... b4
13.Re3
13. ... g6
14.Qf1
Bg7
15.Bb2=+
H.Olafsson - Jonasson, Gardabaer 1996
]
10.a4!?
This thematic detriment of the black pawn structure on the queenside can frequently be found, for example, in the Ruy Lopez.
10. ... Ng6
11.axb5
axb5
12.Rxa8
Bxa8
13.Na3
Na7?!
This is a too passive retreat, which allows White to take over the initiative.
14.Bxa8
Qxa8
15.Qb3
Qb7
16.cxd4
cxd4
17.Nxd4
Bxa3
18.bxa3
Nxe5
19.Bb2
Nc4
20.Qg3!!
O-O
21.Bc3
g6??
22.d3!
Nb6
23.Qe5
Nd7
24.Qg7+
1-0, Sveshnikov - R.Sherbakov, Moscow 1991
][
7.d4
cxd4
8.c4
Qd6
9.Nxd4
Bd7
10.Nxc6
Nxc6
11.Nc3
a6
12.Ba4
Qxd1
13.Rxd1
Ne5! =
Timman - Sveshnikov, Wijk aan Zee 1981
]
7. ... Bd7
8.Na3
By the pattern, the position resembles some variations from the system 2.c3, Sicilian defense. Besides, the white queen's knight development to a3 can frequently be found in that system
8. ... Ng6
9.Bf1
[
9.Bc4!?
White decides to build his play on exploiting the exposed position of the black queen in the center of the board.
9. ... Qh5
file:///D:/chessOK_courses/ctart.chessok.com/course/chess-opening-sicilian-defense-1-e4-c5/rossolimo-variation-3-bb5/3-bb5-e6.html
10.d4
cxd4
11.Nb5
Rc8
12.Be2!
Qd5
9. ... Be7
10.d4
cxd4
11.Nb5
Rc8
12.Nfxd4
Nxd4
13.Nxd4
a6
[
12. ... dxc3
13.Ng5?!
13. ... cxb2
14.Bxh5
bxa1=Q
15.Nxf7!
Qf6?!
13.Nfxd4
a6?!
Taking into account an endangered position of his queen in the center, Black should rather discharge tension in the center by
[
15. ... Bb4!
16.Nbd6+
Kf8
17.Nxc8
Bxc8
18.Bxg6
hxg6
19.Nxh8=+
Kg8
20.Re4
Ba3
21.Nxg6
Bxc1
22.Rh4=+
Bb2
23.Rh8+
Kf7
24.Qxa1
Bxa1
25.Rxc8
Kxg6
26.Rc7
Nd8
27.h3=+
]
16.Nxh8
a6
17.Nd6+
Bxd6
18.Qxd6+=
Fercec - Sveshnikov, Nova Gorica 1999)
][
13. ... Nxd4
14.Nxd4
Qa5
15.a4
Be7
16.Bf3
Qc7
17.Nb5
Qb8
18.Be3
a6
19.Nd4
O-O
20.Nf5
Bc6
21.Nxe7+
Nxe7+=
Ulibin - Krasenkow, Swidnica 1997
]
14.Bf3!
Qc5
15.Be3!
Nce5?
16.Bxb7!
axb5
17.Nxe6
fxe6
18.Bxc5
Rxc5
19.Be4
Be7
20.Qd4+-
1-0, Rublevsky - Shabalov, Elista (ol) 1998
][
13. ... Qa5!?
14.g3
O-O
15.Bg2
e5
16.Nc2
Bc6
17.Bxc6
bxc6
18.h4
Rfe8
19.Qg4
Nf8
20.Ne3+=
Gelfand - Sveshnikov, Ljubljana 1995
]
14.g3!
A typical maneuver: by transferring the bishop to the h1-a8 diagonal, White targets the black queenside.
14. ... b5?!
[
14. ... e5?
15.Nf5
Qxd1
16.Nxg7+
Kf8
17.Rxd1
Bg4
18.Bh6
Kg8
19.Rd2
Bf8
20.h3+-
Bxg7
21.Bxg7
Kxg7
22.hxg4
]
15.Bg2
Qc5
16.h4! +=
This is also a typical method, which reveals the black g6-knight's shaky position.
16. ... Bf6
17.Be3
Qc7
18.Nf5!
18. ... O-O
19.Nd6
Rcd8
20.Nb7
Rc8
21.Nd6
Rcd8
22.Nb7
Rc8
23.h5!
[
23.Nc5!
Bc6!
24.Nxa6
Qb7
25.Nc5
Qc7
26.Qe2
Ne5
27.Bd4
Bxg2
28.Kxg2
Rfd8
29.Bxe5
Qxc5
30.Bxf6
gxf6+/-
31.Red1
Kf8
32.a3
Qc6+
33.Qf3
Rxd1
34.Rxd1
Qxf3+
35.Kxf3
Ke7
36.Rd4
h5
37.Rb4
Rc5
38.a4
bxa4
39.Rxa4
f5+/-
]
23. ... Ne5
24.Bf4
Bc6!
25.Bxc6
Qxc6
26.Bxe5
Bxe5
27.Rxe5
Qxb7
28.h6
Qe7!
29.hxg7
[
29.a4!
Rfd8
30.Qg4
g6
31.axb5
axb5+/-
32.Rxb5
Rd7
33.Qf4
Qf8
34.c4
Rcd8
35.Kg2
Rd4
36.Qf3
Rd3
37.Qf6
Qxh6
38.Ra7
Qg7
39.Qxg7+
Kxg7
40.Rbb7
Kf6
41.Rxf7+
Ke5
42.Ra5+
Kd6
43.b4
Rd2
44.Ra6+
Ke5
45.b5
Rb2
46.Kh3
Rc8
47.f4+
Kd4
48.Rxe6
Kxc4
49.Rc6+
Rxc6
50.bxc6
Rc2
51.c7
Kb5+-
]
29. ... Rfd8
30.Qe2
Rc5! =
Black succeeded in neutralizing the opponent's initiative with an accurate defense.
31.a4
Rxe5
32.Qxe5
bxa4
33.Qe4
Qc5
34.Rxa4
a5
35.Qe2
Qg5
36.Rf4
Rd7
37.Qf3
Qd5
38.Qxd5=
Kasparov - Salov, Amsterdam 1991
=-=